Erik Weijers, 10 months ago
The crash of stablecoin US Terra has not discouraged Vitalik Buterin, the founder of Ethereum: he does not rule out that algorithmic stablecoins can work. According to him, a key feature of such a stablecoin should be that it remains stable even in the face of falling popularity.
Buterin argues that while the euphoria in certain circles about US Terra was unwarranted, the current negative mood around stablecoins in general is an overreaction. In his words, we need to move away from stablecoin boosterism but also from stablecoin doomerism. The latter is Buterin's response to the tendency post-terra to write off the whole idea of algorithmic stablecoins. To be clear, Vitalik Buterin did not and does not have any involvement with UST.
What is usually called an algorithmic stablecoin, Vitalik calls an automated stablecoin. Indeed, that may be a more clear-cut term. These automated stablecoins differ from, say, USDT and USDC in that they are decentralized. That is, there is no 'stash of dollars' parked at a company to back the stablecoin. Instead, there is an automated feedback mechanism that keeps the price as constant as possible against (usually) the dollar. In practice, that mechanism is a smart contract that manages on-chain collateral: other crypto.
Some automated stablecoins have been doing well for years. Ethereum's founder points out that MakerDAO's DAI, for example, has successfully withstood extreme market corrections, for example, the March 2020 covid crash.
Why did things go wrong with UST? The bottom line is that LUNA, the currency that kept UST stable (Vitalik calls LUNA the volatile-coin), does not safely reside outside the LUNA ecosystem - as opposed to the situation with for example DAI, USDC or USDT. UST and LUNA were vulnerable to a death spiral, in which both the stablecoin and the paired volatile-coin crash together. If the mood creeps in that the demand for UST (the stablecoin) is going to fall, LUNA also becomes vulnerable. Because if the price of UST drops below the dollar, UST must be taken out of circulation (burned) to get the price back to $1. That is financed by creating LUNA and that puts pressure on the price of LUNA. The moment confidence in future demand for UST suddenly drops hard, it's the end. That became apparent in early May 2022...
Buterin suggests two criteria for potentially successful automated stablecoins:
Certainly that last point is counterintuitive and a tricky one to grasp. Read Vitalik's detailed explanation.
What we are slowly but surely finding out is that an algorithmic stablecoin may not be impossible - but there is no clear path to a future-proof version yet.
Mar 17, 2023
When it became clear that Circle had $3.3 billion stuck at the Silicon Valley Bank the market went wild. USDC lost its peg and was trading way below 1 US-Dollar. Bear market PTSD set in and the broader crypto media was already discussing if USDC would fail. Fortunately, things turned around shortly after the initial turmoil and Circle was made whole again. This has been a big relief for the market but needs some explanation.
Mar 13, 2023
Stablecoin USDC lost its peg of 1 dollar. In the early hours of past Saturday, it even temporarily fell as low as $0.89. The reason is that Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which held dollars that backed USDC, went under. Only after the American Government made the assurance that SVB depositors will be made whole, USDC recovered to $0.99.
Feb 13, 2023
Crypto brokerage firm Paxos will end its relationship with Binance for the BUSD stablecoin. This spells doom for the world's third largest stablecoin. What are the implications of this development: is this a war on stablecoins?
Nov 10, 2022
In the last couple of days many misconceptions about stablecoins were discussed in the media. The FUD was juicy and the story was told that Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) had exposure to FTX and could face serious consequences. None of this is true and while FTX is imploding, stablecoins are not affected.
Sign up to stay informed via our email updates