Robert Steinadler, 5 months ago
Bitcoin is under constant attack by its critics and their biggest talking point is the energy consumption of the network that is caused by the miners. Many Bitcoiners had high hopes that with the mining industry opting for green energy sources this debate would sooner or later become obsolete. It seems that selecting a fitting supplier isn’t enough.
Why is Hydro-Québec looking to cut off Bitcoin miners from one of the biggest green energy supplies available in the world?
According to a public statement of the company, the demand for electricity will increase in the next decade drastically and by around 14 % next year alone. Driving factors for this development are electric cars and what is dubbed as industry 4.0 which is fully automated and each device is connected over the internet.
To meet the increasing demand of the changing industrial environment Hydro-Québec petitioned the authority in question to effectively exclude miners and blockchain service providers from their services.
According to local news media, it is highly likely that this petition will be acknowledged and that mining and blockchain businesses have to move or try to find another option. Hydro-Québec is the biggest energy supplier in Canada and one of the biggest hydro energy suppliers in the world. Needless to say, the regional mining industry could be effectively annihilated or forced to move elsewhere.
The biggest problem is not that Québec is trying to use its energy supply with care. It is the question of who has the right to call out on needless energy consumption. Is binge-watching Netflix important enough or shall we force the company to shut down all the data centers and infrastructure? Do we really have to take pictures of our dinner and our cats and share them on Instagram?
Of course, Bitcoin is currently not the number 1 store of value or payment method in Canada or specifically Québec. It makes only sense to exclude something that has no immediate use within society. With that being said, one could argue against a lot of things that are not contributing much except for a few hours of entertainment.
Bitcoin is a piece of freedom that requires energy to protect the interests of all of its users. In this context cutting off Bitcoin miners from clean energy sources feels completely wrong.
Mar 27, 2023
MicroStrategy has done it again! The company bought Bitcoin and while this doesn’t come as a surprise, the circumstance of the recent move is remarkable. Many critics have pointed out that investment in Bitcoin is risky. Most recently, the market proved that banks can be more volatile than Bitcoin. MicroStrategy took advantage of this fact and made another strong move that drove media attention to the company.
Mar 27, 2023
Tim Draper is well-known for his conviction about Bitcoin. The billionaire bought 30,000 BTC in 2014 during the Silk Road Bitcoin auction. An investment that turned out to be fruitful, to say the least. Because of his conviction, Draper is more than biased when it comes down to the mother of all cryptocurrencies. On the other hand, his success can be interpreted as an indicator that Draper might know a thing or two that other investors don’t. Recently, Draper advised on how business owners and managers should deal with the banking crisis.
Mar 27, 2023
The creator of the impressive skull-shaped artwork commissioned by Greenpeace in its fight against Bitcoin mining, has changed his own view. After long talks with experts on Bitcoin mining, he says he no longer thinks mining is a black and white issue: 'I was wrong'.
Mar 24, 2023
We must admit that we like the artwork better than the campaign. Greenpeace USA had 'art activist' Benjamin Von Wong create a sculpture. Made from waste metal, it's called the Skull of Satoshi. It's supposedly highlighting Bitcoin's 'record of climate destruction'.
Sign up to stay informed via our email updates